My Photo
Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

PeopleSoft was a Great Brand

Recently I gave a workshop on branding for small tech businesses at the Entrepreneur Center in San Jose. In my talk I covered a couple case studies of great technology brands, one of which was directly from my own experience.

Peoplesoft_logoI represented PeopleSoft from 1994-98 during its hypergrowth heyday while at leading industry PR firm The Horn Group. For those readers new to the market, PeopleSoft was a client/server applications pioneer during the early/mid 90s that helped lead the drive to put more computing power on the Windows desktop. PeopleSoft debuted with human resources software and then expanded into Financials (GL, AP/AR…), Manufacturing, and finally CRM.

From my vantage point on the front lines of the early client/server marketplace, where bigger competitors like Oracle and SAP should have eaten PeopleSoft's lunch, I was able to directly observe the power of a great technology brand to clearly differentiate itself and reap the financial rewards. As with all great brands, PeopleSoft was fully actualized along functional, emotional, and aesthetic dimensions.

Functional: PeopleSoft had a great product. Its powerful, intuitive software made full use of Windows UI and was built from the ground up for client/server. It aligned its corporate mission with a larger trend - to leverage the PC revolution (that had hit consumers only five years earlier) and translate its benefits to the workplace. To compete against formidable enemies, PeopleSoft positioned itself as the alternative. Where SAP was the stiff, hierarchal German software that insisted customers reengineer their businesses to fit its model...PeopleSoft was the flexible, friendly software more easily customizable to the customer's business. Where SAP's implementation approach was an expensive, "Big Bang", multi-year process...PSFT stressed a speedier app-by-app rollout for more rapid return.

The psychographics of the initial human resources buyer matched PeopleSoft's own promoted style - relaxed, non-competititive, and willingly referenceable. HR was a low risk corner of the enterprise for IT to test this new-fangled client/server computing, and gave PeopleSoft a beachhead from which to upsell Finance and Manufacturing later. With a solid account management model, its rabid focus was customer satisfaction. The motto: “Positively Outrageous Customer Service.”

Emotional: PeopleSoft appealed to the user's desire for empowerment. Rather than rely on centralized IT for the information needed to do their jobs, line managers wanted to find out the answers for themselves. PeopleSoft didn't singlehandedly create the “knowledge worker” we know today, but tapped into its customers drive to work smarter. If brand is a reflection of alignment between internal organizational values and customer values, then PeopleSoft had it down.

Duffield PeopleSoft's internal culture reflected the laid-back, positive nature of its founder/CEO, Dave Dufflield. His organization was famously flat, light on policy, and hated politics. His employees themselves were empowered with his famous motto, “Don’t ask for permission, ask for forgiveness.” The company handbook said it all, “no bulls**t.”

Aesthetic: PeopleSoft's very name and visual language reflected and re-inforced its initial target market of HR. But it didn't stop there, understanding that every employee and the company's very offices were ambassadors of the brand. The "PeopleSoft Uniform" of khakis and a blue denim shirt (now a cliche in the Valley) were adopted shortly after The Gap signed on as an early customer. Dogs were allowed in PeopleSoft offices long before the dot-coms got all the press. Reception areas and hallways were decorated with large pictures of individual employees posing with their primary hobby or outside interest. A Wall of Fame framed letters from happy customers and users. The whole operation was a warm, inviting, living brand carrying PeopleSoft's mission and vision to the marketplace.

A Great Story. As the PR guy, I pushed this “cult of Dave” more than anyone. The media loved the story. How Dave mortgaged his home to start the company. How Dave answered his own phone and worked from a modest office (despite his shares being worth half a $B at the time). How the employee band was called “The Raving Daves” (Dave purchased their instruments; they played all company meetings). How Dave loved animals and supported the local SPCA. How PeopleSoft actually used its own software (you wouldn’t believe how rare this is). We even once PR’d the fact that the head of PeopleSoft's own HR department was not cutting his hair until the organization went completely paperless!

The Results? Well if anyone argues with me that strong brand equity doesn't translate to financial equity, I cite this case example. PSFT went public in 1992. The company’s CAGR was north of 100% for 5 years in a row, making them the fastest growing business software company in the U.S.  By 1995, PeopleSoft had captured 77% share of the HR software market. That year, the company's market cap was $1.6B with a PE Ratio of 90+ (more than twice Microsoft at the time).

In overall client/server application market share, PeopleSoft was poised to overtake Oracle (which it eventually did). When Duffield handed over the reins to Chris Conway, the original brand eroded. PeopleSoft continued to successfully deposition Oracle as locked into and distracted by its own database business. Oracle had to acquire PSFT (at a 10% premium on its closing value) to finally silence this argument.

Intel: State of the Brand

This is the first in a series of posts on the state of the major tech brands.

Tackling Intel first seemed like a logical choice since the company just launched its new brand identity at the Consumer Electronics Show. The news was covered here and here and here amongst hundreds of other places all around the blogosphere.

Intel Essentially, Intel wants to expand beyond its decade-long positioning as the premier provider of individual products such as microprocessors and build equity as a product solutions platform in 4 key markets: enterprise, mobile, digital home, and health. Gone are the wildly successful "Intel Inside" logo (used for 16 years with PC manufacturers) and the dropped 'e' in the company's main logo (37 years old!) The new tagline asserts that Intel helps customers in its target markets "Leap Ahead". The shift will be rolled out with a $2.5B ad blitz - and if this wasn't evidence enough of the end of an era, I just saw a TV spot last night on Intel's new partnership with Apple.

Intel says this rebranding is a natural byproduct of its reorganization around the Centrino (wireless) and future Viiv (entertainment) platforms - bye bye Pentium. Intel's Eric Kim, newly annointed CMO, believes the evolved brand will "establish a stronger emotional connection with our audiences". Go Eric! Very touchy-feely. Seeing as Kim was the guy credited with turning Samsung into a consumer brand powerhouse vs. Sony, I'm not surprised. He says it unifies and simplifies the look and feel of Intel offerings across product lines - always a noble aim in branding.

All this is the culmination of a busy 2005 for Intel - a year that saw a new CEO, new CMO, new business structure, new marketing dept. and new ad agency. Whew! It is trying to stem the tide of PC market erosion to AMD that has slowed revenue growth from 13 to 7% and profits from 40 to 5%. In the enterprise market, the move to marketing platforms over products comprises a drive to address business challenges with solutions/combinations of products that drive integrated processes. Intel is poised to launch more new products in 2006 than at any time in its history.

Mike's take: "Intel Inside" was a widely successful "ingredient branding" campaign, but with the commoditization of the PC market, it was time to go. Still, I don't know if the redesigned logo is an improvement - can we just BAN THE SWIRL from all enterprise tech design please??! But we all know a brand is embodied in what a vendor does, not a logo and tag - right?

CEO Craig Otellini is the first non-engineer to run the company. He told BusinessWeek that marketing expertise is the only way Intel can succeed in new markets - by communicating more clearly what the technology can do for customers. What a concept. Obviously, this has made some more technically minded employees uncomfortable. But partners like Apple and Sony seem to be genuinely impressed with the new, more flexible, open, collaborative attitude at Otellini's Intel. Andy Grove is a hard act to follow, but the world has changed. Time will tell if Otellini and Kim have truly reinvented the fifth most recognized brand in the world (according to BusinessWeek) or instead created our market's equivalent of New Coke.

Tech CMOs: Marketing gets no respect

Bad news in an end-of-year study released by the CMO Council. Top marketing executives admit that their group’s performance is lacking, which leads to a lack of influence and credibility within the corporate hierarchy. The survey was sent to senior-level marketing executives at IBM, Intel, Xerox, and other high-tech companies.

Of the 400 executives that responded, some depressing findings:

  • Only 10% of respondents to the survey said their marketing groups are "highly influential and strategic" within the company
  • Less than half said their teams are "well regarded and respected"
  • More than 40 percent of marketers polled say their alignment with the company mission falls between "average" and "not well-aligned"
  • Top listed area of weakness: customer insight and access (46 percent!)
  • In a separate but related data point, I just read in Fast Company that the average CMO tenure among the world's top 100 branded companies is just 23 months, half the life span of their CEOs.

The executive director of the CMO Council said of his study that the problem is that most marketers operate from a rigid tactical orientation rather than with a flexible analytic approach. The answer is to instill processes that measure, analyze, rate and iterate each function and initiative's performance on an ongoing basis. Transform your marketing organization with rigorous disciplines, best practices, and technology-enabled processes that management can respect.

Um, OK. We're all in this together.

PR Pros on Top Tech Brands

I've spent most of my career on the PR side of technology, working on the agency side for firms such as Fleishman-Hillard and The Horn Group, and being the client while running  in-house marcom at startups.  So I enjoy a fairly large network of fellow PR practitioners. 

As part of my primary research project into the state of B2B technology branding, I decided to poll my network for their votes on "the Strongest B2B Technology Brands".  Note that I didn't ask for "the Best Brands" (a more subjective measure, imho).  The survey was conducted over email in October and the results, while far from scientific, do provide a useful data point on which vendors are succeeding and which are not in the minds of our industry's "buzz merchants".

Here's the definition of Brand that I included with the survey to spark the opinions of respondents:
A brand is a customer’s gut feeling about a product, service, or company (good or bad).  Brands are more about emotional resonance than rational thought. Good brands are a promise fulfilled and values shared – they are perceived as authentic, reliable, delightful, and trustworthy.  A brand is not a logo, an identity system, a product, or a strategy.

if you are a PR pro, your Top 3 votes are still welcome!

After 69 votes cast, here are the results:

20.3%  Oracle
14.5%  IBM
13.0%  Cisco
10.1%  Microsoft
7.2%    HP
5.8%    Intel

29.0%  Other (<5%)
100%

Mike’s Analysis:

  • Oracle is no doubt a strong enterprise IT brand, and due to its aggressive stance in the industry of late, is arguably the strongest today.  The "Big O" (as a friend of mine who works there calls them!) captured the lead early in the polling and never dipped below 20%.
  • No argument on IBM either, and it's the best example in our industry of a reinvented brand (consider where they were 10 years ago).  IBM has tons of brand equity (i.e. their brand is worth a lot of $$), but lacks a singular promise and an emotional essence beyond “stability”.  At this point they’re like Coca-Cola, they’re just there.
  • Personally, I find Microsoft a curious choice as its lack of a direct selling model and dominance in B2C weaken it as a true B2B choice - but its high regard in the SMB market obviously places it third.
  • Cisco was a strong brand, now weakened and a bit lost, although I hear they are on the rebound.  HP is weak/lost too, obviously.
  • Intel’s weak showing is surprising.  Sun’s is not.  I was most surprised that SAP did not crack the Top 5.
  • If you are reading this asking, "where are Dell, Apple, Google, eBay etc.?", you obviously aren't reading carefully enough!

My votes for the Top 3? 
Probably Oracle, Salesforce, and MySQL
All three companies share assertive, vocal leadership and a singular mission.  Respectively: Oracle is "total victory" (embodied by recent acquisitions and its Fusion initiative), Salesforce is "no more software" (cast as adoption of the SaaS delivery model), and MySQL is "affordable data management" (one catalyst of the open source LAMP revolution).

Talking about Brand is like talking about God

It has been said that talking about brand is like talking about God.  Everyone has their own definition and beliefs.  Still, I've taken on a new professional mission - to evangelize the power of brand to transform the way my industry sells enterprise technology and satisfies customers.

To understand the current perception of branding and its value for the B2B IT industry, I have undertaken an ongoing qualitative research study, interviewing some of the leading technology marketing minds on their branding dogma.  In this blog, we'll examine and discuss findings from this project.

Buyer2Brand will strive never to be preachy in its tone, but instead present the beliefs and opinions of minds greater than my own, relate insights on the news with links to point of origin, and analyze emerging trends and best practices as asserted by sources we trust in common.

If you are a senior-level technology marketer, and would like to be interviewed, please drop me a line.