My Photo
Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

PeopleSoft was a Great Brand

Recently I gave a workshop on branding for small tech businesses at the Entrepreneur Center in San Jose. In my talk I covered a couple case studies of great technology brands, one of which was directly from my own experience.

Peoplesoft_logoI represented PeopleSoft from 1994-98 during its hypergrowth heyday while at leading industry PR firm The Horn Group. For those readers new to the market, PeopleSoft was a client/server applications pioneer during the early/mid 90s that helped lead the drive to put more computing power on the Windows desktop. PeopleSoft debuted with human resources software and then expanded into Financials (GL, AP/AR…), Manufacturing, and finally CRM.

From my vantage point on the front lines of the early client/server marketplace, where bigger competitors like Oracle and SAP should have eaten PeopleSoft's lunch, I was able to directly observe the power of a great technology brand to clearly differentiate itself and reap the financial rewards. As with all great brands, PeopleSoft was fully actualized along functional, emotional, and aesthetic dimensions.

Functional: PeopleSoft had a great product. Its powerful, intuitive software made full use of Windows UI and was built from the ground up for client/server. It aligned its corporate mission with a larger trend - to leverage the PC revolution (that had hit consumers only five years earlier) and translate its benefits to the workplace. To compete against formidable enemies, PeopleSoft positioned itself as the alternative. Where SAP was the stiff, hierarchal German software that insisted customers reengineer their businesses to fit its model...PeopleSoft was the flexible, friendly software more easily customizable to the customer's business. Where SAP's implementation approach was an expensive, "Big Bang", multi-year process...PSFT stressed a speedier app-by-app rollout for more rapid return.

The psychographics of the initial human resources buyer matched PeopleSoft's own promoted style - relaxed, non-competititive, and willingly referenceable. HR was a low risk corner of the enterprise for IT to test this new-fangled client/server computing, and gave PeopleSoft a beachhead from which to upsell Finance and Manufacturing later. With a solid account management model, its rabid focus was customer satisfaction. The motto: “Positively Outrageous Customer Service.”

Emotional: PeopleSoft appealed to the user's desire for empowerment. Rather than rely on centralized IT for the information needed to do their jobs, line managers wanted to find out the answers for themselves. PeopleSoft didn't singlehandedly create the “knowledge worker” we know today, but tapped into its customers drive to work smarter. If brand is a reflection of alignment between internal organizational values and customer values, then PeopleSoft had it down.

Duffield PeopleSoft's internal culture reflected the laid-back, positive nature of its founder/CEO, Dave Dufflield. His organization was famously flat, light on policy, and hated politics. His employees themselves were empowered with his famous motto, “Don’t ask for permission, ask for forgiveness.” The company handbook said it all, “no bulls**t.”

Aesthetic: PeopleSoft's very name and visual language reflected and re-inforced its initial target market of HR. But it didn't stop there, understanding that every employee and the company's very offices were ambassadors of the brand. The "PeopleSoft Uniform" of khakis and a blue denim shirt (now a cliche in the Valley) were adopted shortly after The Gap signed on as an early customer. Dogs were allowed in PeopleSoft offices long before the dot-coms got all the press. Reception areas and hallways were decorated with large pictures of individual employees posing with their primary hobby or outside interest. A Wall of Fame framed letters from happy customers and users. The whole operation was a warm, inviting, living brand carrying PeopleSoft's mission and vision to the marketplace.

A Great Story. As the PR guy, I pushed this “cult of Dave” more than anyone. The media loved the story. How Dave mortgaged his home to start the company. How Dave answered his own phone and worked from a modest office (despite his shares being worth half a $B at the time). How the employee band was called “The Raving Daves” (Dave purchased their instruments; they played all company meetings). How Dave loved animals and supported the local SPCA. How PeopleSoft actually used its own software (you wouldn’t believe how rare this is). We even once PR’d the fact that the head of PeopleSoft's own HR department was not cutting his hair until the organization went completely paperless!

The Results? Well if anyone argues with me that strong brand equity doesn't translate to financial equity, I cite this case example. PSFT went public in 1992. The company’s CAGR was north of 100% for 5 years in a row, making them the fastest growing business software company in the U.S.  By 1995, PeopleSoft had captured 77% share of the HR software market. That year, the company's market cap was $1.6B with a PE Ratio of 90+ (more than twice Microsoft at the time).

In overall client/server application market share, PeopleSoft was poised to overtake Oracle (which it eventually did). When Duffield handed over the reins to Chris Conway, the original brand eroded. PeopleSoft continued to successfully deposition Oracle as locked into and distracted by its own database business. Oracle had to acquire PSFT (at a 10% premium on its closing value) to finally silence this argument.

Tech PR Veteran on Branding

Ed Niehaus and I sat down recently as part of my ongoing primary research exploring the current state of B2B tech branding.  Ed is an industry veteran who headed one of the top technology PR firms from the early 90s through the Internet boom - Niehaus Ryan Wong.  NRW launched Yahoo, Verisign, Apple's iMac, Veritas, and 3 Pixar movies.  The agency was one of the unfortunate casualties of the dot-bust, but luckily its founder lives on as a VC at Cypress Ventures

It's no secret that public relations is often the first program in the marketing mix that technology startups choose to outsource.  PR can be among the earliest third parties to influence how a new company positions itself in the marketplace.  PR becomes the first line of marcom offense in getting a vendor noticed and talked about.  Some may argue that PR firms and practitioners enjoy an undue share of influence over how and which new technologies and personalities move our industry.

My former employer The Horn Group was in friendly competition with NRW, so I've had nothing but respect for Ed.  He is one of the best at his craft.  He recognized early on that the firm's strong reputation engendered a unique opportunity to offer new clients a value-added service on Branding, hence trumping the leading advertising/interactive agencies at the time.  Ed believes brand is definitely a CEO-level discussion, one of the most strategic decisions, and so he wanted PR to have a seat at the table.  Now Ed is no fan of advertising - not even the inexpensive kind - and it's fair criticism to say NRW's service neglected the aesthetic design element in branding (it had no visual deliverables).  Still, Ed was out in front in recognizing the powerful role of PR in building tech brands.

Reflecting both enterprise and consumer tech experience, Ed recommends talking about brand with management of B2B companies in terms of the the vendor's reputation.  This approach would help the discipline mature and hold it to the same litmus test as all marketing spend these days.  Namely, does the activity drive either awareness or sales?  Buzz or share? 

According to Ed, brand comprises not just the positioning of the venture (i.e. product solving target customer pain better than competition), but its values and vision as well.  Brand is not the identity package itself, but elements reflect the entire "affective domain" of the company - its deeper sensory appeal to the buyer.  This is also impacted by buzz in the market, which is created by (surprise!) PR.

Finally, Ed had a parting piece of advice for most startups: stop expending 90% of your communications effort solving internal struggles, and only 10% talking to the outside world!  Could the solution he's implying be "hire a good PR firm", I wonder?

PR Pros on Top Tech Brands

I've spent most of my career on the PR side of technology, working on the agency side for firms such as Fleishman-Hillard and The Horn Group, and being the client while running  in-house marcom at startups.  So I enjoy a fairly large network of fellow PR practitioners. 

As part of my primary research project into the state of B2B technology branding, I decided to poll my network for their votes on "the Strongest B2B Technology Brands".  Note that I didn't ask for "the Best Brands" (a more subjective measure, imho).  The survey was conducted over email in October and the results, while far from scientific, do provide a useful data point on which vendors are succeeding and which are not in the minds of our industry's "buzz merchants".

Here's the definition of Brand that I included with the survey to spark the opinions of respondents:
A brand is a customer’s gut feeling about a product, service, or company (good or bad).  Brands are more about emotional resonance than rational thought. Good brands are a promise fulfilled and values shared – they are perceived as authentic, reliable, delightful, and trustworthy.  A brand is not a logo, an identity system, a product, or a strategy.

if you are a PR pro, your Top 3 votes are still welcome!

After 69 votes cast, here are the results:

20.3%  Oracle
14.5%  IBM
13.0%  Cisco
10.1%  Microsoft
7.2%    HP
5.8%    Intel

29.0%  Other (<5%)
100%

Mike’s Analysis:

  • Oracle is no doubt a strong enterprise IT brand, and due to its aggressive stance in the industry of late, is arguably the strongest today.  The "Big O" (as a friend of mine who works there calls them!) captured the lead early in the polling and never dipped below 20%.
  • No argument on IBM either, and it's the best example in our industry of a reinvented brand (consider where they were 10 years ago).  IBM has tons of brand equity (i.e. their brand is worth a lot of $$), but lacks a singular promise and an emotional essence beyond “stability”.  At this point they’re like Coca-Cola, they’re just there.
  • Personally, I find Microsoft a curious choice as its lack of a direct selling model and dominance in B2C weaken it as a true B2B choice - but its high regard in the SMB market obviously places it third.
  • Cisco was a strong brand, now weakened and a bit lost, although I hear they are on the rebound.  HP is weak/lost too, obviously.
  • Intel’s weak showing is surprising.  Sun’s is not.  I was most surprised that SAP did not crack the Top 5.
  • If you are reading this asking, "where are Dell, Apple, Google, eBay etc.?", you obviously aren't reading carefully enough!

My votes for the Top 3? 
Probably Oracle, Salesforce, and MySQL
All three companies share assertive, vocal leadership and a singular mission.  Respectively: Oracle is "total victory" (embodied by recent acquisitions and its Fusion initiative), Salesforce is "no more software" (cast as adoption of the SaaS delivery model), and MySQL is "affordable data management" (one catalyst of the open source LAMP revolution).

Talking about Brand is like talking about God

It has been said that talking about brand is like talking about God.  Everyone has their own definition and beliefs.  Still, I've taken on a new professional mission - to evangelize the power of brand to transform the way my industry sells enterprise technology and satisfies customers.

To understand the current perception of branding and its value for the B2B IT industry, I have undertaken an ongoing qualitative research study, interviewing some of the leading technology marketing minds on their branding dogma.  In this blog, we'll examine and discuss findings from this project.

Buyer2Brand will strive never to be preachy in its tone, but instead present the beliefs and opinions of minds greater than my own, relate insights on the news with links to point of origin, and analyze emerging trends and best practices as asserted by sources we trust in common.

If you are a senior-level technology marketer, and would like to be interviewed, please drop me a line.